• GOOD TOUGH KID
  • ARCHIVES
  • M. James McDonald
Menu

True Myth Media

  • GOOD TOUGH KID
  • ARCHIVES
  • M. James McDonald

Search the Archives…

Contact Us/ Request a REview
brightposter.jpg

Bright (2017)

Directed By: David Ayer

Starring: Will Smith, Joel Edgerton, Noomi Rapace, Edgar Ramirez

Rating: TV-MA

Running Time: 1 H 57 M

TMM: 1 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Dumb Fun

Weaknesses: Writing, Directing, Acting

Bright (2017)

January 4, 2018

Summary:

In a quasi-fantastical alternate universe, two LA cops- one an Orc, and the other, human- must navigate the underworld to obtain a magic wand, which, if in the wrong hands, could be used as a deadly weapon.

BRIGHT_Unit_10265_R3_2040.0.jpg

My Thoughts

Bright_edgarramirez_netflix.jpg

As an avid fan of all things fantasy, I looked forward to this movie with warranted skepticism. We fantasy fans have been hurt before, and recently (looking at you, Hobbit trilogy, “Warcraft”, “The Dark Tower”, etc.). Fantasy stories are hard to do right, primarily because the worlds in which the stories take place need so much work in order for them to feel like they have depth. Good fantasy films have rules for their magic systems, there are consequences when magic goes awry, races or species have deep cultures and backstories. Good fantasy stories create entire worlds that we can escape to.

This is not a good fantasy film.

The world in this film seems like a Frankenstein’s monster created from the mismatched limbs of other fantasy worlds. Jim Butcher’s Dresden Files is obviously a rather large influence as far as feel and tone, but Ayer pulls creature designs from Lord of the Rings, World of Warcraft, Harry Potter and plenty of other mainstream fantasy worlds. Vague backstories and even vaguer prophecies make for a poorly established setting. The elves are in an elevated status, better than humans and orcs, though there is no real reason given for this elevation. Humans are in the middle, and orcs are at the bottom of the heap because they worshipped a dark deity two thousand years ago (I want to make note that the film uses this scrap of backstory to take several thinly-veiled jabs at religion). Other than the looks of the characters, however they all behave relatively the same (the races have different languages, but don’t think they went full Tolkien and developed dialect. It’s all mumbled jargon). The orcs mention a coming of age blood ritual, and that’s about the most insight we get into any of the species cultures. This isn’t a thought out fantasy world, it’s as half baked as they come.

Enough about the underdeveloped world of Bright, what about the actual story- does it offer anything new and exciting? Does Will Smith knock it out of the park? Is this Ayer’s best movie since he wrote “Training Day”?

dims.jpg

No.

399195bef74e2c4ec1484cb8139e9f2047987a4d.jpg

Will Smith stars as Ward, a character whom has been cut from the same cloth as the other loudmouthed, brazen anti-heroes Smith has been known for playing his whole career. Have you seen “Independence Day”? “I, Robot”? “Men in Black”? “Wild Wild West”? “I Am Legend”? Okay, well, you know what you’re getting into. Alongside him, heavily caked in layers of grey-blue orc makeup, is Joel Edgerton (“Gringo”) as Jakoby, the first orc allowed on the LAPD. Ward is not happy about being assigned to Jakoby, as he thinks the orc will only cause trouble, and he’s not shy about voicing his views to his fellow officers. His ‘racist’ views towards Jakoby make Ward’s character even less likeable, but Ward is not wrong in thinking Jakoby’s presence will cause issues; within the first few minutes of the film Ward takes a point-blank shot to the chest from a large-gauge shotgun. Don’t worry- the wound has absolutely no effect on Ward because he was wearing a bulletproof vest, which, given the vest's divine durability, must have been made of mithril.

Plot holes, ridiculous twists, and cringe-worthy dialog string together the action scenes, none of which are remarkable. Screenwriter Max Landis (“Chronicle”), said he drew heavily from Ayer’s earlier works, particularly “Training Day” and “End of Watch”, and this is incredibly evident. There is a twist in “Training Day” that is repeated almost scene for scene in “Bright”; just replace Mexican drug runners with orcs. The writing is lazy; adding orcs and elves into a cliché storyline doesn’t make the storyline more original.

The story tries to poignantly touch on hot social issues like police brutality and racism, but the bullheaded way in which the film approaches these issues ends up totally negating anything it wants to say. Metaphors unravel if you pull at the slightest thread. Jabs at police brutality end up coming off as insensitive and slightly silly. There is a scene where Ward and Jakoby drive up on cops whom are mercilessly beating a few orcs with batons; instead of stopping the cops from beating the orcs or helping the cops arrest them, Ward gives Jakoby a lecture on the meaning of loyalty to the badge. Brutality unfolds behind them while they casually chat in their vehicle; they drive away without giving lending help or even giving a reason for their stop.

I’d be remised if I didn’t mention makeup and creature effects, which look to pull inspiration from the earlier episodes of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (think Xander fighting the praying mantis teacher in S1 E4- Teacher's Pet); the makeup on every single humanoid character is distracting. It’s hard to see any sort of emotion on Jakoby’s face underneath the layers of makeup. “Is he crying?” My roommate asked during one scene. “I don’t know,” I responded. “He’s staring at the ground… so that must mean he’s sad, right?”

But, hey… let’s be real for a minute. Anyone who has intentions to watch a Will Smith fantasy/ buddy-cop/ action movie must know that the film will never win any Oscars (nor any other awards for that matter); the real reason you’d watch this movie is pure, simple, mind-numbing entertainment. So, does this film succeed in entertaining the viewer at least?

Bright-10.jpg

No.

Will-Smith-Bright.jpg

I watched this film with my roommates, and after about a half hour, one of my roommates stood, stretched, and said dryly, “I think that’s about enough of that.” He was the smart one. Alas my other roommate and I were already committed. We were like Dante and Virgil in Inferno. We’d passed under the gates warning us to ‘Abandon all Hope,’ and the only way out was through Bright's seven circles of hell, where the end of the film and the credits lay waiting. We would finish the film, and suffer the consequences (mainly boredom).

The action in this film is dull; the gunfights are uninspired, and the magic used is wishy-washy, and the powers granted by this wand are very vague, so we don’t exactly know what could happen if the wand were to fall into the wrong hands. We’re told over and over again that the wand can be used to (yawn) resurrect the Dark Lord, but the implications of this are left for the viewer to decide. Will the realm of Hades bleed over the earth? Will this Dark Lord be worse than Hitler, Caligula, and Vlad the Impaler combined? Who knows, and who cares? The writer and director clearly didn’t, so why should you?

If you are looking for something dumb and (at times) fun, then you could watch this, but please know there are a million other movies out there that are more worthy of your time. Yes, this may be free with your Netflix subscription, but remember that watching this helps Netflix justify putting out subpar product.

If you keep watching crap, they’ll put out more crap.

The reason Hollywood doesn't invest in truly original concepts is because American viewers are okay with sub-par schlock. Critics are panning this movie, as they well should (as I’m writing this, “Bright” is sitting at a 28% on Rotten Tomatoes, but the audience score for this film is much higher, sitting at an 87%.) Lazy writing, unlikeable characters, poorly executed action scenes, and a sad attempted social commentary make for what I would call a very boring, generic movie, but apparently it’s just what the people of America are looking for (“Bright 2” was announced two days before “Bright” dropped on Netflix). Just because something has magic in it does not mean it is magical.

Verdict

Ultimately, the choice is yours- critics everywhere have voiced their criticisms, but that hasn’t stopped Netflix from pressing forward with the sequel. I personally believe that the time I wasted watching this would’ve been better spent trying to melt all the snow in my front yard with a bic lighter. There is a market for this type of movie- it panders to the lowest common denominator. If you’re fine with knowing that what you’re watching is dumber than bovine with brain damage, then by all means tune in.

Seth+Steele.jpg

Review Written By:

Seth Steele

Author's Bio Page
In Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci Fi, Thriller Tags Edgar Ramirez, Joel Edgerton, Noomi Rapace, One Star, Will Smith, David Ayer, 2017
Comment
last.jpg

Star Wars: Episode VIII: The Last Jedi

Directed by: Rian Johnson

Starring: Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Mark Hamill

Rated: PG-13 for Sequences of Sci-fi Action and Violence

Running Time: 2 H 32 M

TMM: 5 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Everything

Weaknesses: -

Star Wars: Episode VIII: The Last Jedi (2017)

January 1, 2018

The seventh entry in the Star Wars saga.

Read More
In Action, Adventure, Fantasy, Sci Fi Tags PG13, Star Wars, Rian Johnson, 5 Stars, Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, Adam Driver, Daisy Ridley, John Boyega, Oscar Isaac, Andy Serkis, Lupita Nyong'o, Domnhall Gleeson, Gwendoline Christie, Laura Dern, Benicio Del Toro, Frank Oz, Justin Theroux, 2017
Comment

Wonder Woman (2017)

June 27, 2017

When an American pilot from World War 1 crashes through to the island, Wonder Woman learns that war is ravaging the world. Convinced that Ares is behind the war, Diana sets out to kill him with the only legendary weapon capable of harming him.

Read More
In Action, Adventure, Superhero Tags 4 Stars, PG13, DC Movies, Patty Jenkins, Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Connie Nielsen, Robin Wright, David Thewlis
Comment
mummyposter.jpg

The Mummy (2017)

Directed by: Alex Kurtzman

Starring: Tom Cruise, Sofia Boutella, Annabelle Wallis

Rated: PG-13 for Violence, Action and Scary Images, and Some Suggestive Content and Partial Nudity

Running Time: 1 H 50 M

TMM: 2 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: One of the Action Sequences

Weaknesses: Everything Else

The Mummy (2017)

June 12, 2017

Tom Cruise fights a Mummy in the first and last installment of the Dark Universe Series.

Read More
In Action, Adventure, Mystery, Thriller, Fantasy Tags 2 Stars, PG13, Alex Kurtzman, Tom Cruise, Russell Crowe, Annabelle Wallis, Sofia Boutella, Jake Johnson, Courtney B. Vance, 2017
Comment
arrivalposter.jpg

Arrival (2016)

Directed by: Denis Villeneuve

Starring: Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, Forest Whitaker

Rated: PG-13 for Brief Strong Language

Running Time: 1 H 56 M

TMM: 5 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Story, Editing, Acting, Cinematography, Musical Score

Weaknesses: -

Arrival (2016)

June 1, 2017

A linguistics specialist is recruited by the US army to try to make contact with Aliens.

Read More
In Drama, Adventure, Mystery, Thriller, Sci Fi Tags 5 Stars, PG13, Denis Villeneuve, Amy Adams, Jeremy Renner, Forest Whitaker, Michael Stuhlbarg, 2016
Comment
Ben-Hur1959-cropped300.jpg

Ben-Hur (1959)

Directed By: William Wyler

Starring: Charlton Heston, Jack Hawkins, Stephen Boyd, Haya Harareet, Hugh Griffith

Rated: G

Running Time: 3h 32m

TMM: 5 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Story, Themes, Set Pieces, Acting, Epic Scale

Weaknesses: Some Acting, Length

Ben-hur (1959)

September 23, 2016

SUMMARY

Judah Ben Hur is a Jewish Prince. When his boyhood friend, a Roman named Messala, is named Tribune of Jerusalem, Judah refuses to betray his people to him. Messala frames Judah for an assassination attempt to advance his career, condemning Judah to death and imprisoning his entire family. Judah swears revenge and will stop at nothing to destroy the man who destroyed his family.

ben-hur.jpg

MY THOUGHTS

Ben-Hur.jpg

I’m gonna get this out of the way. This is my favorite movie of all time. That’s not to say it doesn’t have it’s flaws but this is a biased review. This is a film I grew up with and the only real reason I am doing a review of it is because the remake came out this year and I want to do a review of that and maybe an article on it and our culture of remakes.

Why is this my favorite film? I can only get into it so deeply. I could talk for hours, and have, about why I love this film, so everything I am about to say should be taken as a sort of cliff notes version of my opinion.

STORY IS KING

The story of “Ben-Hur” is simply phenomenal. Granted it is an epic with a running time to match its grandeur and with that comes a lot of time to tell the story, but that story is told in a classic style that just isn’t seen much anymore. It is content to let you get to know the characters and not rush through their introductions and conversations, which explore deep motivations. These motivations drive the emotion and action of the film, so even though some of the stylings of the movie seem old fashioned compared to flashier films, the emotion of those scenes land more forcefully than almost any blockbuster you’ll see in the theaters this year.

It may be a long film, but it isn’t a boring one. The story is huge and when the story is big, so is the run time, because in great films, story is king.

IGNORED THEMES

The theme of “Ben-Hur” is another stand out success for me. It’s a theme largely ignored today and especially for the Christian looking for a movie with themes in line with their worldview, it’s a theme more artistically and fairly treated than in most Christian films today.

The theme of this film can be spoken of in two ways for me. The first, is that revenge, even once truly accomplished, can never satisfy the longing the wronged party feels. The second, is that only Christ can heal that which justice can only punish.

These are themes which Hollywood largely ignores today. Most art ignores them. We see plenty of revenge films where a man swears revenge, gets at the bad guy, refuses to take revenge, then is forced to kill the bad guy when they are attacked, but this is not the same. At the end of the day, the bad guy is dead and the good guy gets closure for the wrong that was done.

The problem is that this is not how life really works. This is how stories work but in real life, revenge does not heal. It punishes.

In “Ben-Hur,” the hero kills the villain only to find out that the wound his family has suffered will not heal. The villain dies with forty-five minutes left in the film! What could possibly be left to accomplish in that last act? The director shows that when all of man’s efforts to put things right have failed, the power of Christ is what heals those wounds, by restoring to Judah all that had been taken from him. Revenge could never do that.

This theme, that revenge, even justice, cannot assuage humanity’s desire for resolution and healing is almost completely ignored today and it is a powerful and needed message.

boats ben hur.jpg

SET PIECES, ACTING, AND EPICS

Ben-Hur-1959-Images.jpg

These three I lump together because they work together to give this film a scale that few others accomplish. “The Ten Commandments”, “Spartacus”, “Lawrence of Arabia”, and “Ran” are all epics on a grand scale, appreciated by critics for their massive accomplishments. “Ben-Hur” belongs on that list.

The set pieces are masterfully done, especially the chariot race, where you never lose track of the action, who is in what place, why they are doing what they are doing, or the emotion that they are feeling at any given moment. The sea battle is terror inducing as you watch dozens of men scramble for their lives as their ship goes down. A ship they have been locked and chained to.

The direction does not shy away from long wide shots and would rather show you the world the characters live in than hide it from you to save money. In fact, it revels in showing you the slow lap of a field of chariots around the Great Circus, just to show you the stage these men will be required to race upon and its epic size and audience.

ben_hur_heston_5.jpg

The acting is from a forgotten and unappreciated age for most audiences but I love it. There is something about the way lines are delivered and even written that gives them a weight which I find myself devouring as it is spoken. While they make pronouncements and speak in every room like they are performing to the back walls, it seems almost natural that they would. The scale of their speech is not so much realistic as it is matching of their surroundings. I see the remake and I think, this man doesn’t talk like a prince, and I have a hard time imagining him talking to an emperor and doing anything but cowering, but Charlton Heston (“The Agony and the Ecstasy”) and Stephen Boyd (“Fantastic Voyage”) speak with authority and power, which befits their station and the scale of this epic.

WEAKNESSES

That’s not to say this film is perfect. It’s not. The acting while many times fittingly large and grand, is sometimes too large and grand. No one will probably ever accuse Charlton Heston of being too subtle an actor.

The treatment of Christ in the film is heavy handed, though I would argue not nearly so heavy handed as in the remake. Luckily, in the day this film was made, people restrained themselves when depicting Christ and this practice saves the movie from making Jesus more of a character than he should have been. Like explosions, films best use Jesus sparingly, rather than splashing him on the screen every chance they get.

Lastly, the film is long. There are definitely sections that could be trimmed and even cut completely (I’m looking at you opening nativity scene and narration.) It was made for an audience with attention spans and youtube has unfortunately put this film out of reach for many.

FINAL THOUGHTS

It’s the greatest. What can I say? I love this film. I recommend it to all of my film friends and none of them watch it. I recommend it to all of my Christian friends and none of them watch it. I recommend it to my in-laws, and wife, and none of them watch it.

I hope someday they do. I hope you do. So here is my final plea.

If you like classic films, watch Ben Hur,

or

If you like epic films, watch Ben Hur,

Or

If you like Christian films, watch Ben Hur.

Just Watch Ben Hur.

On a side note:

Since whitewashing of casts is a current topic in film communities, yes this film whitewashes. However, I would like to point out that one of the main characters, the main love interest and female lead in the film, Esther, is actually played by a Palestinian, Haya Harareet. I just find that to be some interesting casting in an age when no one would have batted an eye.

Michael+Contemplative+Beach.jpg

Review Written By:

Michael McDonald

Author's Bio Page
In Action, Adventure, Christian Film, Drama, Epic Tags William Wyler, G, 5 Stars, Charlton Heston, Jack Hawkins, Stephen Boyd, Cathy O'Donnell, Martha Scott, Hugh Griffith, 1959, Haya Harareet
2 Comments
green-room-poster.jpg

Green Room (2016)

Directed By: Jeremy Saulnier

Starring: Anton Yelchin, Imogen Poots, Alia Shawkat, Patrick Stewart, Macon Blair

Rated: R for Strong Brutal Graphic Violence, Gory Images, Language and Some Drug Content

TMM: 4 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Direction, Cinematography, Effects, Realism, Acting

Weaknesses: Themes

Green Room (2016)

May 24, 2016

Financially struggling but dedicated touring Punk Rock band “The Ain’t Rights,” are trapped in the green room backstage at a venue run by Neo-Nazis after witnessing a violent crime.

Read More
In Action, Adventure, Thriller, Horror Tags 4 Stars, R, Jeremy Saulnier, Anton Yelchin, Mark Webber, Macon Blair, Imogen Poots, Patrick Stewart, 2016, Alia Shawkat
Comment
captain-america-civil-war-poster-1-1.jpg

Captain America: Civil War (2016)

DIRECTED BY: ANTHONY AND JOE RUSSO

STARRING: CHRIS EVANS, ROBERT DOWNEY JR., SCARLETT JOHANSSON

RATED: PG-13 FOR EXTENDED SEQUENCES OF VIOLENCE, ACTION AND MAYHEM

RUNNING TIME: 2 HOURS 27 MIN

TMM: 4 OUT OF 5 STARS

STRENGTHS: THEMES, ACTION, NEW CHARACTERS, BELIEVABILITY

WEAKNESSES: WINTER SOLIDER, MOMENTARY LAPSES IN GRAPHICS, PULLS PUNCHES, LAME VILLAIN

Captain America: Civil War (2016)

May 11, 2016

The Avengers split between those who are for the regulation (led by Tony Stark, aka Iron Man) and those who oppose it led by Captain America.

Read More
In Action, Adventure, Superhero Tags PG13, Chris Evans, Anthony Russo, Joe Russo, Robert Downey Jr, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie, Don Cheadle, Jeremy Renner, Chad, Paul Bettany, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, Tom Holland, Daniel Bruhl, Frank Grillo, William Hurt, Martin Freeman, Marisa Tomei, John Slattery, 2016
Comment
Batman.jpg

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Directed By: Zack Snyder

Starring: Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams

Rated: PG-13 for Intense Sequences of Violence and Action Throughout, and Some Sensuality

TMM: 2 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Wonder Woman, Visually Engaging, Iconic

Weaknesses: Slow Pacing, Lack of Connection to Characters, Studio Concerns, Lack of Mystery, Henry Cavill

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

March 29, 2016

Batman and Superman meet in a clash of psuedo-epicness.

Read More
In Superhero, Action, Adventure, Mystery Tags 2 Stars, PG13, Ben Affleck, DC Movies, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Jesse Eisenberg, Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Jeremy irons, Holly Hunter, Gal Gadot, Scoot McNairy, Zack Snyder, 2016
Comment
ten commandments.jpg

The Ten Commandments (1956)

Directed By: Cecil B DeMille

Starring: Charlton Heston, Yul Brynner, Anne Baxter

Rated: G

Running Time: 3 h 40 m

TMM: 4 out of 5 Stars

Strengths: Production Design, Effects, Acting

Weaknesses: Length, Dialogue, Also Acting

The Ten Commandments (1956)

March 24, 2016

A retelling of the story of Moses found Exodus

Read More
In Christian Film, Adventure, Drama, Epic, Biblical Tags 4 Stars, G, Cecil B DeMille, Charlton Heston, Yul Brynner, Anne Baxter, Vincent Price, John Carradine, 1956
Comment
RISEN_DOM_1SHEET.jpg

Risen (2016)

Directed by: Kevin Reynolds

Starring: Joseph Fiennes, Tom Felton, Peter Firth

Rated: PG-13 for Biblical Violence Including Some Disturbing Images

TMM: 3 Stars out of 5

Strengths: Production Value, Joseph Fiennes

Weaknesses: Disjointed Story, Stephen Hagan

Risen (2016)

March 22, 2016

A roman Tribune searches for Christ after the ressurection.

Read More
In Christian Film, Drama, Adventure, Mystery Tags 3 Stars, PG13, Risen, Kevin Reynolds, Joseph Fiennes, Tom Felton, Peter Firth, 2016
Comment
← Newer Posts

Powered by Squarespace